dah bunuh orang tapi tak bersalah?

"u are guilty for murder and will be punished under Section 302"
nauzubillah..mintak2 dijauhkan

dah bunuh, tapi tak bersalah?

hm..

penat rasanya bila berjinak jinak dengan segala macam jenis defence ni..

macam2 ada..

yelah..ada certain orang,

dia bunuh orang bukan semata-mata sebab dia memang nak bunuh orang tu

tapi adalah sebab2 nya yang laen..

sbb tu lah wujudnya exceptions dalam kes murder nih

semua pengecualian itu ada 5 macam

exception 1; provocation

exception 2; exceeding the right of private defence

exception 3; public servant or the person aiding the public servant had exceeded power given by law...

exception 4; sudden fight

exception 5; consent

n sebelum kita tgk exception tu semua, kita kena tahu dulu or identify issue in question,

contoh macam mami mimi sintia cakap,

whether Ali may raise the defence of provocation under Exception 1 of Section 300 of Penal Code when charged for murdering Baba.

oh, panjang gitu issue nya ya dong

then bila dah ascertain the issue,

the law will follow..

i will follow u..(intonasi mcm iklan Digi)

kalau ikut undang-undang, in order to succeed in raising the defence of provocation,

there are 4 elements altogether that must be established first.

among them are,

1) provocation must be sudden and grave,

2)the link between provocation and the killing

3)cooling off period

4)proportionality of the retaliation

4)and lastly reasonable man test

untuk first element tu,

word per se cannot constitute sudden and grave provocation according to Malaysian court

no matter how harsh it is,

the word only cannot be an excuse for a person to deprive the life of other person

percaya tak?

kalau x percaya, cer review balik kess PP v Norazam bin Ibrahim

dalam kes tu, si mati mmg cakap kat tertuduh,

(translated roughly as)

'ur mother's cunt, ur father's ill omen or misfortune' and babi

doesnot constituted provocation pun and thus the conviction for murder is rightly established

oh tapi, kalau the provocation tu memang dah wujud dari lama, court akan look into consideration on that case.

ni lebih kurang macam kes gunung berapi pendam lah..

sikit2 boleh tahan

tapi kalau dah meletup,

hah, matilah sorang

cool-cool-BURST!

court case yg discuss pasal essence ni kes Mat Sawi bin Bahadin v PP

try baca, konfem paham kenapa judge cakap dia tak bersalah eventhough

dia dah bunuh orang

n org tu mak mertua dia sendirik woo

baca jangan tak baca k?

next, move on to 2nd element,

the link between provocation n killing

mestilah kena ada kaitan mcm mana provocation tu boleh berakhir dengaan bunuh

barulah boleh succeed

ko guano?

dalam kes othman bin Mat v PP,

court held exception 1 doesnt apply having regard to the evidence that the accused didnt angry at the time the deceased's wife called him swine and having regards that there is a long lapse of time between the bathroom accident and the incident where there is a fight between the deceased and accused that lead to the death of si mati..so, the link tu tak bersambung kan..

ok,next: cooling off period

kalau u ols kena provok kan,

lepas tu u ols ade masa nak cool down,

silalah jangan pergi bunuh org tu eventhough dengan tiba-tiba teringat apa yang dia buat n

 u ols punya darah jadi mendidih membuak buak

sbb nya, kalau u ols pegi bunuh jgak, mmg u ols lah yang akan follow dia nanti

duk dalam kubur dulu

syurga neraka tu lain kira lagi

macam dalam kes Chong Teng v PP,

time si mati tu tgh minum teh, the accused datang lepas tu stabbed si mati ni twice.

satu terkena kat jantung.

the accused raised the defence of provocation tapi court held the provocation doesnt apply as the incident happen wwhich the deceased had taken away accused's wife happen long time ago

jadi, matilah si Chong Teng di tali gantung...

macam tu lah jugak nasiB Mohamad Yassin v PP,

waktu sepanjang malam yang dia duk asah hujung berus gigi nak bunuh si mati tu sebenarnya memang dah cukup untuk dia cool down.there is indeed sufficient cooling off period,

haah, gitu kata judge..

4th element, proportionality of retaliation..

nak memberontak pon agak2 lah weh

biarlah sepadan dengan apa yang diprovok tu..

kes N. Govindasamy mmg kena dengan element ni

kes Don John Perrera pon masuk juga

)

ok, last ly,

reasonable man test

dalam kes Lorensus Tukan v PP dan kes Che Omar bin Mat Akhir v PP,test reasonable man tu macam gini

-whether a reasonable man from the same class of society as the accused, when placed in the same situation as the accused was placed would be provoked and lose his self-control as the accused-

kes Nanawati v State of Maharashtra, the reasonable man test will depends on the circumstances such  customs, manner, way of life, tradition and in short, the cultural,emotional and social background of the person.

in PP v Thirunyanam, tertuduh memang bersalah sbb any reasonable man would not act as what he done to the girl.

nak tahu apa yang dia buat, silalah baca kes yer awk awk semua.

oklah..

tu baru exception 1, maybe kalau ada masa n mood,

sy nak hupdate next exception plak..

InshaAllah )

p/s:otak mereng sikit baca law.ni just roughly semata.ada banyak kekurangan..:)